3 comments

• Comment Link Wednesday, 07 December 2011 08:11 posted by A@

  Thanks for your comments and insights.
  Alan
• Comment Link Tuesday, 06 December 2011 12:00 posted by Markus

  every time i listen to one of your interviews Alan i am impressed how well you focus and listen and keep up with all the intricacies of the complexities of what the person interviewed comes up with... i guess you've been practicing.
• Comment Link Tuesday, 06 December 2011 03:52 posted by Patrick

  This was fascinating to hear; I didn’t realize time altering technology existed on Earth to this degree and it’s not even being covered up by the wrong hands!
  
  Hearing about the grandfather paradox experiment with the seedlings... I did notice a pretty large assumption was being made that the outer reality, outside of the field, changed, yet was un-noticed by those on the outside, due to them apparently being changed along with it. That interpretation is, of course, consistent with conventional preconceived historical fictional notions about time travel.
  
  However, with Occam's Razor... Isn't it more probable that the outer reality did not change at all, and what actually happened was that an exchange was made within the field, between two different parallel realities, or two different timelines if you prefer?
  
  In other words, the DNA that was sent back in time was not the same DNA that returned. The fact that the "grandfather's" descendants remained in the outer reality afterward, just with different DNA than what returned, would support this.
  
  Einstein said it's all a matter of perspective, didn't he? The way he put it, it's all relative. It's all in how you look at it, all in how you choose to use your consciousness to define it.
  
  Thus I am not suggesting that one way of seeing it is right and the other wrong. I believe it probable that they are each right, from their own perspectives - as is the nature of consciousness-created reality: We create and perceive what we believe.
  
  Thus I'm offering a different perspective of perceiving what happened, one which would allow for some interesting results, one being laying to rest of all the fears of disrupting the timeline that I heard David expressing so much...
  
  Another being that a protocol could be established to create a dialog with your counterparts in an alternate timeline. Perhaps multiple parallel realities (or timelines) could thus coordinate their research and work together to more easily develop multi-reality technologies.
  
  I would also like to say, about the technology falling into the "wrong hands" like alleged governments and military, etc., is not something to fear for this reason:
  
  Every individual being chooses which parallel reality they exist in moment to moment anyway. Thus if military were to use this technology as an aid in viewing probable futures in order to "win" their wars haha, all they would be doing is using that technology to assist themselves in shifting themselves to a parallel reality where they apparently "won".
  
  Even this would fail somewhat quickly, for reality is ultimately shaped by intent/vibration, not the outdated paradigm of cause and effect. Quantum Physics and Law of Attraction shows us that vibration is the true cause of the result, and the classically so-called "cause" is more of an effect of the result.
  
  In other words, it's like time's arrow is running backwards with intent/vibration at the helm. First you set a vibration, then manifest the effect, and then manifest the cause if you wish to see the path of how the effect came into being. We're all shaping the past from the present all the time, for consciousness exists outside of time.
  
  And this further supports the results of the grandfather paradox experiment. In my perspective, the outer reality did not change, and yet the DNA apparently sent back to be destroyed, did “change”, and thus, still having the same effect, the seedlings and their DNA, a different cause was required to manifest. Thus the experiment swapped causes of the effect – as causes are somewhat interchangeable.
  
  As for fearing military and other “wrong-hands’” use of this technology, anyone not choosing to join them in their quantum journey into darker realities would be unaffected. In fact if anything, it would speed up those who choose negative vibrations phasing themselves into their preferred realities and out of the rest of us’ who vibrate peace and are creating a peaceful world.
  
  Those who choose negative vibrations can create their hell on earth, just as the rest of us create our heaven on earth. With an as many parallel realities as there are living beings and nanoseconds, there's room for everyone to do whatever they choose and be as free or bondaged as they choose with their vibration. There is no need to fear or for silly "new world order" monitoring systems… not unless you want to shift yourself in a negative reality where all that stuff is needed, then by all means…
  
  Of course history has proven a hundred times over that such attempts at tightly controlled systems are NEVER secure or sustainable. Hey all it takes is one glitch, one temporal incursion, say 10,000 years from now and poof haha! …It’s all gone before we were born, right? :D. Of course history has shown it won’t take 10,000 years, in fact it sounds like it’s too late already, that they’ve already begun tampering with history…
  
  Of course to follow that tangent further just for fun, you could always take the route they took in the computer game, The Journeyman Project, where they stored a disc containing all the recorded history of the world ten million years in the past, a time before any likely temporal incursion, in order to detect alterations in history and compare the new timeline with the original to trace the past incursion point.
  
  On the brighter side, technologies like this can also be used as training wheels to assist us, not just to shift ourselves into specific realities, but also to provide feedback of how we’re already shifting ourselves. Since we shift ourselves through parallel reality to parallel reality all the time anyway; using such technology can help people recognize how we’re shifting and develop a more conscious awareness of what we’re actually doing, and thus develop the ability to be conscious about it, so as to be able to decide on a particular reality to shift to, then shift to it, without being dependent on the technology. This would apply more to the information side than the physical travel side, but ultimately it would extend to the physical travel side as well.
  
  Anyway, thanks for the talk Alan and David. I enjoyed hearing it!